Your AI agent reported success. We verify it against the record.
Weaveframe independently reconciles what your AI agents claim to have done — moving reserves, filing a return, submitting a claim — against the authoritative system it was supposed to affect. Not another log. A second, independent check.
Founding design-partner diagnostics are fixed-scope, 2–4 week engagements.
Logging is not proof.
Identity, policy, approval, and observability tools can all tell you an agent was authorized and that it made a call. None of them tell you whether the claimed outcome actually landed — correctly — in the system that matters.
What gets recorded today
The agent was who it claimed to be.
The action was within its permitted scope.
A human approved it, if your policy required that.
The tool call returned a success response.
What Weaveframe checks
Did the reserve movement actually reconcile with the custodian and the chain?
Did the amount filed match what the jurisdiction's own records show is owed?
Does the submitted claim match the clinical record it's supposed to be based on?
The missing link: independent verification.
Identity, authority, policy and approval establish whether an agent was allowed to act. Weaveframe independently checks what happened after execution — against the systems that actually hold the record.
Three places the gap is already expensive.
We're focused on workflows where an outside party — a regulator, an auditor, an attestation firm, a payer — will eventually check the work themselves, whether or not you've checked it first.
Stablecoin & crypto treasury agents
Reserve-backed issuers attest — monthly, with the CEO and CFO personally certifying accuracy — that reserves match outstanding supply. As treasury agents rebalance and move funds across custodians, we independently verify every agent-initiated transfer against custodial and on-chain data before it becomes a line in that attestation.
Tax compliance agents
Tax platforms are moving from AI-assisted to AI-executed workflows — agents that calculate, prepare, and file with less human review at every step. We independently verify what an agent filed matches what was actually owed, closing the gap between "the agent says it filed" and "the jurisdiction confirms it's correct."
Claims & billing agents
AI billing agents submit claims at a volume no team can manually sample-check — and the statutory penalty for a false claim applies per claim, not per dollar. We independently verify that what an agent billed matches the clinical documentation behind it.
A tool built by the same vendor whose agent is under review has an obvious incentive problem.
-
01
We don't build or sell agents
Weaveframe checks the agents you already run — we have nothing to gain from grading them generously.
-
02
We check against systems we don't control
The reconciliation source is your bank, your custodian, your ERP, or your clinical record — not a log the agent wrote about itself.
-
03
The output is built to be handed to someone else
An auditor, an attestation firm, an insurer, or a board — the evidence is structured for a reader who wasn't in the room.
We're working with a small number of design partners.
If you're running AI agents in treasury, tax, or claims workflows today, we'll independently reconcile a sample of their actions against your systems of record and hand back a concrete report — something you can put in front of an auditor, an attestation firm, or your own board.
- A fixed-scope reconciliation of a sample of agent actions
- A written discrepancy report, not just a dashboard
- A fixed price, agreed before we start